Why We Must Move Left On Immigration
The Emerging Zionist Dictatorship is Weaponizing Anti-Immigration as an Instrument of Political Repression
In the present political era, we find ourselves at a crossroads—one defined not by the traditional left/right divide, but by an epochal shift in the architecture of ruling class power. For over half a century, mass immigration policies were driven primarily by the dominant sectors of the ruling class aligned with cultural liberalism, globalist capital, and the technocratic managerial elite. These policies, as I have argued in the past, were not rooted in humanitarian ideals but were wielded cynically as a tool of class warfare: to fragment cohesive national identities, to depress wages, to create dependent client populations, and to neutralize resistance from the historic working class.
But the wheel has turned.
We now live under the emergent shadow of a new hegemonic order—one dominated not by the academic liberal elites of yesteryear, but by a consolidated triad: the Zionist security-industrial bureaucracy, the tech oligarchy, and the commanders of global finance capital. Together, they are giving birth to a novel form of soft-totalitarian governance, wherein opposition is criminalized not through overt Stalinist repression but through economic erasure, digital surveillance, and extraterritorial penal colonies disguised as "immigration enforcement."
We are entering what can only be described as the Zionist-authoritarian phase of Western decline, and in this phase, immigration is no longer a tool of cosmopolitan liberalism—it is a weapon of reaction. Anti-immigration has become the ideological justification for a new apparatus of repression.
From Liberal Tool to Reactionary Weapon
In my 2011 address, I outlined how mass immigration functioned historically as an arm of “Totalitarian Humanism”—an elite ideology that masked its naked class interests behind the rhetoric of universalism and equality. Back then, the main beneficiaries were capitalist employers seeking cheap labor, politicians hungry for votes, bureaucrats building fiefdoms, and progressives eager to atone for the imagined sins of Western civilization by offering up its social cohesion on the altar of multiculturalism.
But as the ruling class itself has fragmented and reoriented, so too has the function of immigration policy. In the current moment—particularly after the realignment triggered by the October 7th events and the pro-Palestinian protest wave of 2024—we have witnessed a rightward lurch among the dominant sectors of finance, tech, and Zionist influence networks. These actors now seek to consolidate authoritarian control not through open borders, but through biometric walls, digital censorship, and militarized border enforcement.
Consider the Biden-Trump policy convergence of early 2025. In March, reports confirmed the extra-legal deportation of migrants from sanctuary cities to private detention centers in El Salvador, operated by a U.S.-backed security contractor with ties to Israeli surveillance firms. These “extraditions,” carried out with little due process, were justified using anti-immigration rhetoric crafted to please the MAGA base—but in reality, they served a deeper purpose: the creation of gulag-style holding zones outside U.S. jurisdiction, immune to civil rights litigation and media scrutiny.
Simultaneously, pro-Palestinian student protesters at several universities were arrested under vague “foreign influence” laws—laws which were passed under the guise of immigration control, but whose real function was to silence dissent against Zionist policy. These acts mark the consolidation of immigration enforcement as a domestic counterinsurgency tool.
Why the Opposition Must Pivot Leftward
Given these conditions, it is now necessary—even for those of us who have historically been skeptical or critical of mass immigration—to adopt a left-wing position on immigration, at least tactically and temporarily.
Let me be clear: this does not mean embracing the naiveté of “no borders” idealism or denying the social consequences of demographic upheaval. Rather, it means recognizing that anti-immigration rhetoric and enforcement have now been weaponized by the most authoritarian sectors of the ruling class to destroy civil liberties, repress protest, and criminalize ideological opposition.
Just as the radical left in earlier eras learned to adopt civil liberties and free speech rhetoric to protect their organizing efforts, so too must today’s opposition forces embrace the defense of immigrants and immigration rights as a strategic front in the larger war against technocratic despotism and Zionist-led political repression.
This is not about loving or hating immigration. It is about recognizing how power works in real time. Today, immigrants are the test population for a broader apparatus of state terror. Today, the migrant is surveilled, databased, detained, and deported—tomorrow, it will be the dissident, the critic, the nationalist, or the independent journalist.
To defend immigration today is to defend all of us tomorrow.
From Strategic Opposition to Revolutionary Realignment
The historical irony is profound. Mass immigration, once the pet project of the cultural left, is now being reversed and reconstructed by the authoritarian right—not to restore sovereignty or protect the working class, but to centralize control under a surveillance-theocratic model of governance dominated by a Zionist-corporate axis.
We must therefore reverse our own ideological polarity. If they have shifted right on immigration to repress dissent, we must move left on immigration to defend dissent.
It is no longer enough to critique immigration from the standpoint of community or culture. The real enemy is the regime that manipulates immigration as a cybernetic lever of power—alternating between mass importation and mass expulsion to engineer compliance.
In this emerging reality, where “anti-immigrant” means pro-gulag, pro-surveillance, pro-Zionist purge, there is only one choice for those who still value liberty, justice, and resistance:
Move Left on Immigration.
Even if just for now.